Peer review

Reviewing of manuscripts is carried out in accordance with the "Regulations on the procedure for reviewing scientific articles".

Reviewing of manuscripts of scientific articles in the editorial office of the online publication is carried out in order to ensure a high scientific level and high scientific value of published scientific works.

All manuscripts submitted to the editorial office of the online publication and drawn up according to the rules for authors of the online publication are subject to review.

The order of consideration of the article

The editors of the online publication accept for consideration articles reflecting scientific views, results and achievements of fundamental and applied scientific research in the main sections: "Medical Sciences", "Social and Human Sciences", "Pedagogy". Manuscripts that do not correspond to the topics of the listed subject areas are not accepted for consideration.

The article is accepted for consideration by the editors of the online publication, provided that it meets the requirements posted on the website of the online publication at https://icjournal.ru

Materials are accepted by the editors by e-mail in the following form:

— a copy of the article carefully verified by the authors, designed in accordance with the requirements for publications of an online publication, previously not published anywhere and containing a bibliographic list of references;

- abstract (brief description of the thematic content of the article) - 150-250 words, keywords - 3-5 words and phrases (in Russian and English; summary in English should be an exact translation of the Russian version);

- an official referral from the institution where the work was performed, drawn up on an official letterhead.

The manuscript of a scientific article received by the editors of the online publication is considered for the completeness of the submitted documents and the compliance of the manuscript of the article with the requirements of the editorial office, the profile of the online publication and the rules of registration. In case of non-compliance with the conditions of publication, the article may be returned to the author for revision.

The article corresponding to the profile of the online publication and the requirements for publication is registered with the date of receipt, title, full name. author(s), place of work of the author(s) and sent for review.

The order and procedure for reviewing manuscripts

All manuscripts of articles submitted to the editorial board and prepared according to the rules of the online publication are sent for review to specialists in the field of scientific research. Reviewing is carried out confidentially in the form of an expert questionnaire approved by the editorial board.

Reviewers are notified that the manuscripts sent to them are the private property of the authors and are classified as confidential information. Reviewers are not allowed to make copies of articles for their own needs. Reviewers are required to follow the adopted Regulations on the ethics of scientific publications and confirm their agreement with a signature in the review.

Reviewers are required to follow the exemplary instructions for reviewers. The reviewer must consider the article sent to him within the established time limits and send a review by e-mail (within 30 days), or a reasoned refusal to review (5 working days).

The author of the reviewed work is given the opportunity to familiarize himself with a copy of the review without a signature and indicating the surname, position, place of work of the reviewer. If the review of the article contains an indication of the need to correct it, then it is sent to the author for revision.

In this case, the date of receipt by the editorial office is the date of return of the revised article. If the article is not returned by the author from revision for more than 6 months, it is removed from consideration. The revised article is resubmitted for review along with the authors' response to each point of the comments.

In case of disagreement with the opinion of the reviewer, the author of the article has the right to provide a reasoned answer to the editors of the online publication. The article can be sent for re-reviewing to another specialist.

The original reviews are stored in the editorial office of the online publication for 5 years. At the request of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Ministry of Education and Science), reviews must be submitted to the Higher Attestation Commission and / or the Ministry of Education and Science.

Publication decision

The decision on the expediency of publication after review is made by the Editorial Board.

After receiving the reviews at the next meeting of the editorial board, the issue of the received articles is considered and, based on the conclusions of the reviewers, the final decision is made to publish the article or refuse to publish it. The decision of the editorial board is taken by a simple majority of votes.

In case of rejection of the article from publication, the editorial board of the online publication sends a reasoned refusal to the author within three working days. An article not recommended by the reviewer for publication is not accepted for re-consideration.

Recommendations for the design of a review by a reviewer

The title of the review is in bold type and includes the title of the article and the names of all authors. Example: "Review of the article" ... .. "authors ...". The text of the review is drawn up in Russian and English, certified by the signature of the reviewer.